DADT’s #1 victim to be expelled from Natl Guard.

2009 June 30
by Chris

art.choi.gay.afp.gi.jpg
This is wrong, by the strongest sense of the word.

A panel of New York National Guard officers has recommended that an Iraq war veteran who acknowledged his homosexuality must leave the service, his supporters said Tuesday.

First Lt. Dan Choi disclosed in March that he is gay, challenging the 1994 “don’t ask, don’t tell” law that requires the military to discharge troops who disclose their sexual orientation. Tuesday’s ruling, made after a daylong hearing, is a step toward stripping Choi of his officer’s commission and ending his career.

This man is a veteran, plain and simple. Whether he is gay or not is irrelevant. The entire concept of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is outdated, and it’s something which needs to be eliminated.

Let’s go, Barack. With one executive order, this archaic rule could go away for good. Make it happen. 266 men and women have been discharged for being gay since you took office. This stops now.

20 Responses
  1. 2009 July 1
    A1CB permalink

    The military is ALL about following rules and taking orders…if you can’t cut it, they cut you.

  2. 2009 July 1

    As evidenced by several of the comments here, DADT is being used (however lawfully or unlawfully) as a means to discriminate against homosexuals and feel justified doing so (“DADT is good for flushing out his kind”). Discrimination of this sort against a single group of individuals is a breach of the tenets of the Declaration of Independence and the 14th Amendment, and as such DADT is unconstitutional in my opinion.

    It is for this reason that I support President Obama when he finally stands up to his promise and strikes down Don’t Ask Don’t Tell; such bigotry has no place anywhere, military or not, and giving those who would be bigots a lawful vehicle upon which to place their hatred is against the central tenets of this country.

  3. 2009 July 1
    edd permalink

    I cannot believe people actually think the way some of you do. Such poor examples of humanity. People saying they served in the military but are this narrow and unworldly.. these are the people interacting with other countries on our behalf? No wonder the world hates America. People like ‘you’ do not belong in the 21st century; ‘your’ archaic ideals applied to a world that; thanks to people more with a bravery you could never understand; has already passed by. DADT is irrelevent; you said so yourself; “I too served with all types of people since 1957 to about 2000 as a military member and as a DoD Civil Servant before I retired.” So what? People can serve and be killed if they are gay as long as they don’t admit who they really are? So it’s ok to send the gays out to die but not okay for them to be able to be themselves before death? It’s okay for army people to get hooked on drugs but not okay for them to be gay? Are you serious? Thank god your time has past as you race to your death bed. The world will be much better off once the ignorant bigots like you are gone. I should probably respect you for serving in the military; but I just cannot respect people that think like this. Did you miss the whole point of the Civil Rights Movement or you just don’t care? So pathetic. How old are you 60-70? Pathetic. Do you have your KKK card still you could show us?

  4. 2009 July 1
    regulusred permalink

    Holy moly, quite the firestorm, and I’m not even involved. I’m ashamed of myself.

    I think many people miss the boat on who is really to blame for these rulings, and the reality of some parts of this situation.

    Its unfortunate, but its the other male soldiers that keep this policy alive. Frankly, showering and all that with other men isn’t a big deal until one of them might be checking you out. At that point, men find out why men’s and women’s restrooms are separated. Its just a comfort thing, right or wrong.

    The man is a veteran, and its a horrid shame that he’s being discharged for being gay, but the board isn’t really to blame, and neither is any one man anywhere. Its a whole mentality in the military, and those minds need to be changed before the policy changes.

    As for Obama making this okay, forcing gays into the military is probably not a great idea. That said, the gay friendly community has pinned a ton of hopes on this guy, and it’ll be interesting to see if he steps up to the plate. I hope he doesn’t, because making our male soldiers deal with things they don’t want to isn’t the way to run an army, in my opinion. I think the President should respect the wishes and needs of the military on matters like this.

    One more thing:

    “Are you serious? Thank god your time has past as you race to your death bed. The world will be much better off once the ignorant bigots like you are gone. I should probably respect you for serving in the military; but I just cannot respect people that think like this. Did you miss the whole point of the Civil Rights Movement or you just don’t care? So pathetic. How old are you 60-70? Pathetic. Do you have your KKK card still you could show us?”

    This is classic. This is unfiltered hate towards another American, a veteran no less, because he believes differently than you. Pretty sure in your fight for equality you forgot that you need to consider other points of view, or at least be marginally civil. Of course, while you spew ichor, you are accusing the other man of being the dispenser of hatred. Thanks for playing, fool.

  5. 2009 July 2

    Welcome, Red! I was wondering when you’d join the party.

    I’m no veteran. I would never be able to serve my country via the military. I concentrate my efforts at helping the US here in my home town in non-violent and productive ways. Not just the awesome job I was lucky enough to get, but also in being involved in local politics and things like ACS walks, etc. I am proud of many of the soldiers and military men I’ve met who have served my country, but every once in a while I run across one like the man above. I feel the same as the person you quoted, Red, though I don’t always express it as harshly (unless I’m talking to you, of course, because you really piss me off sometimes). I have walked away from conversations with zealously christian, anti-gay, pro-white soldiers and have been satisfied enough at just shaking my head and thinking to myself, “Wow, they don’t even know the country they are serving.” They don’t. If they did, maybe they wouldn’t serve, because they would then have to know that they are defending everyone’s right to be Christian or not be Christian; to be gay or to be straight; to be equal amongst others or to walk with their noses up. Because that is America, the very opposite of what they think they are fighting for. Welcome to the melting pot, folks, come what may.

  6. 2009 July 2

    A young marine recruiter (not doing a very job recruiting by getting into a political conversation) at my college told me that people who don’t want gay people to be treated differently and didn’t want Christian text dictating our laws could “move to a different country.” This is just one example of disconnect between some in our military and the country they are serving. And then there are those thousands of gay soldiers who know all too well the country they are serving and, despite the fact that that country will never let them express who they are or who they love, will still keep quiet and keep on marching for all our freedom. That’s a beautiful thang.

  7. 2009 July 2
    regulusred permalink

    Let’s also not forget that although you mention some recruiters who possess this outlook, there are the silent masses within our military that have no problem with gays, or whatever else walk of life.

    I buy that there are bigots in the military, but I’d caution all of us to remember that by and large, the military makes up the same groups as our citizenry, and most of them wouldn’t kick a veteran out of the military because he’s gay.

  8. 2009 July 2

    Yes, that is exactly why I said that I run into these bigot types every once in a while. It’s hard, however, not to let their behavior speak for all the military because these types are so much more zealous and loud mouthed than those who are open-minded and trying to keep out of trouble.

  9. 2009 July 3
    regulusred permalink

    Well, that’s up to you to have some perspective.

    From my experience: Just because I have met filthy, screaming lunatics yelling at Bush or Vietnam or whatever and they’ve turned out to be terribly angry, hateful people doesn’t mean I think most anti-war people are that way. Being in academia, I deal with somewhat normal liberal zealots each day, and some of them shower quite regularly.

    Anyway, I give soldiers even more of a wiggle space because they’ve chosen to do something so great for this nation. Warts and all, the armed forces are literally the only thing keeping this country sovereign.

Comments are closed for this entry.